Independence on the page.
We accept no work where independence of judgement cannot be maintained. We disclose every relationship that could shape a recommendation on the cover sheet of the engagement, before the file opens.
A short, declarative pledge. Six commitments, a written list of mandates we refuse, and the protocol we follow when a conflict surfaces.
These are not aspirations. They are the conditions under which Lequent will accept and continue to hold a file. A breach is a withdrawal event.
We accept no work where independence of judgement cannot be maintained. We disclose every relationship that could shape a recommendation on the cover sheet of the engagement, before the file opens.
We name the answer we believe is correct before we name the answer that is commercially convenient. If the two diverge, we say so in writing and we keep the receipt.
We decline mandates we cannot defend in public if they reached public scrutiny. The standard is not legality. The standard is whether we would explain ourselves on the front page without hedging.
The floor under every conversation, before the NDA is signed. The Non-Disclosure Policy describes how information is held; this pledge guarantees that the policy is observed.
No member of the firm trades in the securities or instruments of an entity on whose file we are retained, for the duration of the engagement and for thirty trading days after the information is public.
When a finding stops being decisive for an active mandate, it is published in the Observatory. We do not hoard intelligence to extend a billable life. We retire it into the record.
A short list, kept short on purpose. Each entry was written in response to a real mandate we declined. The list is reviewed annually and lengthens only when reality requires it.
The protocol below applies to every prospective and active engagement. It is run by the file principal, not by a separate compliance function downstream of the work.
Every prospective file is screened against the engagement register before a first substantive conversation. Hits stop the conversation until they are resolved on the record.
Conflicts that survive the screen are disclosed on the cover sheet. Silence is not neutrality. If a disclosure would itself breach a duty, the firm declines.
We do not rely on Chinese walls inside a small firm. Where information would have to be partitioned, we decline the second mandate or we exit the first.
A conflict that surfaces mid-engagement requires withdrawal. We do not litigate the threshold; we withdraw and we explain.
A direct channel to the firm principal. Anonymous reports are accepted; identified reports are answered within five working days. Retaliation against a reporter is itself a withdrawal event.
Reports are logged on a register held by the principal. Reports concerning the principal are routed to the supervisory board named in the engagement letter.
Every collaboration starts with a conversation. No agenda, no pitch — just two parties comparing what they see from where they stand. If you're building something interesting, we want to hear about it.
A signal cut from active files. Insights, mandates and tools — published the day they stop being load-bearing for an engagement. No promotion, no tracking pixels, no schedule.